Playboy trades Traci Brooks for dead Farrah Fawcett

Id let her teach me the Dewey Decimal System.

I'd let her teach me the Dewey Decimal System.

Jeremy told me this was on PWInsider and other places but then couldn’t find it again. Thankfully Wrestle Zone still had it up: The Playboy pictorial planned for Traci Brooks around the same time as TNA Bound For Glory has been bumped from the magazine to one of its Web sites. Why? Read: is reporting that the reason why Playboy Magazine has decided to dump Traci Brooks on the cover of the magazine in favor of a Farrah Fawcett tribute is because the leading editor of the issue wanted to distance it from any association with professional wrestling.

Brooks’ layout will instead be featured online to members of Playboy’s Cyber Club.

Oh, a tribute, gotcha. The thing is, we’ve already seen hot young Farrah and decent middle-aged Farrah, so why be redundant? Exhume that bitch and show us some rotting titties! “I’m sorry, is that an Eminem tune?” (TM Dave Attell) Anyway, count me among the sad ones who now have to turn to the Internet to find their pornographic material. And here I thought the World Wide Web was just for posting existential meanings of REM lyrics. -Eric

5 Responses to “Playboy trades Traci Brooks for dead Farrah Fawcett”

  1. stuntgranny 2009-09-03 at 9:57 pm #

    Traci Brooks looks like a male Chyna. – Dusty

    • Awesome Dude 2009-09-04 at 12:23 am #

      Maybe that’s why the new editor suddenly decided pro wrestling is too low class to associate with. Putting a chick in the Cyber Club is like saying you’re too homely and flawed to put in the magazine but since you already got naked, might as well make a buck off some horny suckers.

  2. Danny Full Pint 2009-09-04 at 1:55 am #

    Traci looks like a young, firm Mrs. Doubtfire.

  3. Fanatic 2009-09-04 at 7:25 pm #

    I think they just decided Traci Brooks was too low class to associate with. Someone probably told Hef they took some pictures with a wrestling girl and he assumed it was a WWE Diva. Luckily someone caught the mistake.

  4. bobbilly 2009-09-24 at 11:29 am #


Leave a Reply